Old fashion nasa pc11/7/2023 ![]() ![]() On 31 July 2009, the High Court announced that McKinnon had lost this appeal. On 23 January 2009, McKinnon won permission from the High Court to apply for a judicial review against his extradition. McKinnon appealed to the European Court of Human Rights, which briefly imposed a bar on the extradition. The House of Lords rejected this argument, with the lead judgement (of Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood) holding that "the difference between the American system and our own is not perhaps so stark as 's argument suggests" and that extradition proceedings should "accommodate legal and cultural differences between the legal systems of the many foreign friendly states with whom the UK has entered into reciprocal extradition arrangements". McKinnon's barrister said that the Law Lords could deny extradition if there was an abuse of process: "If the United States wish to use the processes of English courts to secure the extradition of an alleged offender, then they must play by our rules." U.S.-style plea bargains are not a part of English jurisprudence (although it is standard practice to reduce the sentence by one-third for a defendant who pleads guilty). ![]() Representing McKinnon in the House of Lords on 16 June 2008, barristers told the Law Lords that the prosecutors had said McKinnon faced a possible 8–10 years in jail per count if he contested the charges (there were seven counts) without any chance of repatriation, but only 37–46 months if he co-operated and went voluntarily to the United States. He had also expressed fears that he could be sent to Guantanamo Bay. and charged, McKinnon would have faced up to 70 years in jail. McKinnon remained at liberty without restriction for three years until June 2005 (until after the UK enacted the Extradition Act 2003, which implemented the 2003 extradition treaty with the United States wherein the United States did not need to provide contestable evidence), when he became subject to bail conditions including a requirement to sign in at his local police station every evening and to remain at his home address at night. The indictment contained seven counts of computer-related crime, each of which carried a potential ten-year jail sentence. In November 2002, McKinnon was indicted by a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia. He was interviewed again on 8 August 2002, this time by the UK National Hi-Tech Crime Unit (NHTCU). After this interview, his computer was seized by the authorities. McKinnon was first interviewed by police on 19 March 2002. All the evidence was that someone was staging a very serious attack on US computer systems. He did very serious and deliberate damage to military and NASA computers and left silly and anti-America messages. As a result of Mr McKinnon's actions, we suffered serious damage. US policy is to fight these attacks as strongly as possible. A senior military officer at the Pentagon told The Sunday Telegraph: US authorities stated that McKinnon was trying to downplay his own actions. I will continue to disrupt at the highest levels It was not a mistake that there was a huge security stand down on September 11 last year. US foreign policy is akin to Government-sponsored terrorism these days . While not admitting that it constituted evidence of destruction, McKinnon did admit leaving a threat on one computer: US authorities stated that the cost of tracking and correcting the problems he caused was over $700,000. McKinnon was also accused of copying data, account files and passwords onto his own computer. After the September 11 attacks in 2001, he allegedly deleted weapons logs at the Earle Naval Weapons Station, rendering its network of 300 computers inoperable and paralyzing munitions supply deliveries for the US Navy's Atlantic Fleet. McKinnon also posted a notice on the military's website: "Your security is crap". US authorities stated he deleted critical files from operating systems, which shut down the United States Army's Military District of Washington network of 2000 computers for 24 hours. McKinnon was accused of hacking into 97 United States military and NASA computers over a 13-month period between February 2001 and March 2002, at the house of his girlfriend's aunt in London, using the name 'Solo'. On 16 October 2012, after a series of legal proceedings in Britain, then Home Secretary Theresa May blocked extradition to the United States. Gary McKinnon (born 10 February 1966) is a Scottish systems administrator and hacker who was accused in 2002 of perpetrating the "biggest military computer hack of all time", although McKinnon himself states that he was merely looking for evidence of free energy suppression and a cover-up of UFO activity and other technologies potentially useful to the public. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |